Hero worship: A primitive, submissive, anti-enlightenment trait

Actor Rajni’s new movie Kaala released on 6-Jun-2018. His fans created their usual furore by blocking traffic, having giant banners erected on the streets and worshipping him by pouring milk on the banners. This frenzy of their primitive urges consumes his fans for a few days before they think of anything else. I do sometimes understand that government should not intervene in people’s lives but such behaviours are borderline sociopathic. Pouring huge quantity of milk on banners to mark celebration when you have babies dying of hunger and malnutrition is a venomous habit. While I do realise the actors might not condone it but they do not oppose it either. In one way, they depend on the fanatic following to keep them in business. This behaviour once again brings the entire topic of hero worship to the forefront of public debate.

Oxford Dictionary defines hero worship as an excessive admiration for someone. There are two key words here which make the trait extremely uncomfortable, first one is the adjective ‘excessive’ and the second one is the object ‘someone’. Any form of excessive admiration is going to be dangerous and if people start to admire individuals rather than behaviours, then you are surrendering your critical faculties to the whim of the admired.

Collage-Heroworship.jpgCollage of different hero worships in India

There is definitely a psychological and as an extension of the evolutionary reason for hero worship. I am definitely not an expert in the field but there are some good articles written in this area. The need for a hero figure who can solve all the worldly issues has resulted in allegories, the creation of Gods and prophets. As much as the archetype of longing for such heroic figures can have a primitive and evolutionary background, it doesn’t make the acting on this belief intellectually credible. We have a primitive urge to procreate as much as we can but most of us don’t do it as it is not needed and mostly counterproductive. The development of our large brain and its ability to process provides homo sapiens with the advantage of thinking beyond these legacies. I do see the point where some philosophers believe in a pragmatic nature of truth, whereby making actions like hero worship credible as a result of the net comfort it brings to the individuals who believe in it. However, I do not buy into that theory. It diminishes the expectation in people to think and act responsibly. Further, it also disregards the entire collective human knowledge we have gained from our history. Hero worship had no positive impact on the society and it is of no use in the present era.

On a more practical level, I find the behaviour of worshipping individuals as an enslavement of the human mind. It is a very submissive trait where one surrenders their critical faculties to the whim of individual being worshipped as the hero. This leads them to exhibit eccentric behaviours in favour of the hero. It also prevents people from seeing the flaws of the hero. I am fine with people looking at a trait and admiring a trait in other individuals but worshipping individuals come will be a slippery slope considering people exhibit complex and often contradictory behaviours. The idea of enlightenment in the modern philosophical context is one of reason, progress, liberty, emancipation and fraternity. I do not think hero workship, however defensible it may be from an evolutionary perspective can be squared into that category.

My fascination to “The Village Schoolmaster”

Art has something that transcends logic as I know it. As I grew up, few poetries have stuck with me without me realising it. I wasn’t a good student and found my literature teachers intolerable. However, I did manage to read a bit of poetry in English and Tamil, two languages which I understand.

As I reflect on my fascinations, interests, admirations, I am intrigued by how these relate to Oliver Goldsmith’s village schoolmaster. Here is the poem for people who don’t know or want to enjoy the lyrical beauty. I will then write about lines which meant a lot to me.


Beside yon straggling fence that skirts the way
With blossom’d furze unprofitably gay,
There, in his noisy mansion, skill’d to rule,
The village master taught his little school;
A man severe he was, and stern to view,
I knew him well, and every truant knew;
Well had the boding tremblers learn’d to trace
The days disasters in his morning face;
Full well they laugh’d with counterfeited glee,
At all his jokes, for many a joke had he:
Full well the busy whisper, circling round,
Convey’d the dismal tidings when he frown’d:
Yet he was kind; or if severe in aught,
The love he bore to learning was in fault.
The village all declar’d how much he knew;
‘Twas certain he could write, and cipher too:
Lands he could measure, terms and tides presage,
And e’en the story ran that he could gauge.
In arguing too, the parson own’d his skill,
For e’en though vanquish’d he could argue still;
While words of learned length and thund’ring sound
Amazed the gazing rustics rang’d around;
And still they gaz’d and still the wonder grew,
That one small head could carry all he knew.
But past is all his fame. The very spot
Where many a time he triumph’d is forgot.

 

Admiration for comedy

Comedy is a natural healer, an involuntary reaction and something which pushes boundaries. Comedy requires some special skills where you have to think deeply about an incident, exaggerate it to the right proportion and deliver it well to the audience. It is hard to be a dumb comedian especially if you writing your own scripts.

Love for learning

Life is a losing struggle from the time we were born. This is true for species to the stars. If I am going to lose everything that I get, I would rather gain happiness through knowledge than economic wealth. The truth is always deeper and more fascinating than what is apparent to our senses.

Arguing for life

Every new discovery requires our DNAs to reprogram. It isn’t easy. The best way to learn is by winning the war of ideas. The war of ideas is won by winning smaller battles like debates. Debates are inherently interesting and challenging.

Fascinated by people with knowledge

I can’t emphasise more on my fascination towards people with knowledge of multiple subjects. The people I admire, my father, Christopher Hitchens, Karl Marx, Professor Steven Hawking, Noam Chomsky and list goes on, were all people with knowledge on diverse subjects, with the ability to connect them and articulate a well thought out point.

In conclusion, art transcends generations and pushes boundaries. As I see growing intolerance towards art, communities taking offence and curtailing their free spirit, I wonder if we will slowly limit the pervasiveness of this wonderful subject. That is exactly why it is important to fight for liberty and freedom.